Skip to content
For research use only. Not for human or animal consumption. Read the content policy

Site Feedback

According to peer reviewed papers and using basic logic wouldn’t ghk cu

Started by member_4378 7 replies 7 people Last activity

OP
#1
According to peer reviewed papers and using basic logic wouldn’t ghk cu. Most topical products with ghk-cu use a very small amount because more ghk-cu doesnt mean more signaling
Link Reply
#3
I had a hair transplant done back in December and wanted to see if anyone here has experience using GLOW during recovery. If you’ve used it post-transplant, what was your daily dosage? Did you notice any difference in growth, thickness, or shedding? Appreciate any real-world feedback. Thanks in advance.
Link Reply
#4
Also, ghk is only like 340 daltons which isn’t small enough to penetrate the skin. It would have to be encapsulated or you’d have to micro needle then apply it immediately
Link Reply
#8
According to peer reviewed papers and using basic logic wouldn’t ghk cu easily penetrate stratum cornium and somewhat penetrate upper epidermis? Is that simply not enough for it to be considered viable?
Link Reply

That was the end of the thread

You just read 8 posts from 7 people in Site Feedback, written between Jan 2026 and Feb 2026.

Reading stays open to everyone — nothing here is behind a login. An account adds one thing: the ability to answer.

More in Site Feedback