Skip to content
• For research use only. Not for human or animal consumption. Read the content policy

Site Feedback

Dude your point is irrelevant here, cause when it comes to your door

Started by maple01 31 replies 4 people Last activity

OP
#1
Dude your point is irrelevant here, cause when it comes to your door are you not gonna use it ? cause if you do, you still have 4-5 days to use the whole vial thats gonna do nothing lmao the point still stands. Arguing sematics isnt gonna get you far here buddy
Link Reply
#2
And since your 16, your body is already producing max collagen as it is, so it makes it even more placebo, you could make the collagen argument for someone who is in there 50s but your not
Link Reply
#3
Bro im not gonna lie, you need to take a Biology classs, 16 year old is the age of max collagen sythesis. Adding more doesnt do anything at all. Its like drinking more water when you aready hyrdrated. if your body isnt producting enough you would know, you would have wrinkly skin of a 40 year old at 16 which i promise you dont
Link Reply
#4
n if collagen maxing is your goal use the things i said above like HGH, microneedle, trentinoin that far more supperior for that goal. again my point still stands, and your still talking sematics
Link Reply
#16
Bro do you know what sematics mean ?????? you keep bringing up these points that are so irrelavant. Like we could go back n forth about what bac water and copper do and how it works. But that does make the peptide work better lmao
Link Reply
#18
Dude, im going to say this cause there must be some confusion: This is how studies work: they need to hypothesis the theory and understand the mechanisms and than test it on rats to see if theory and mechanims sound. These studies are finaically funded and the researchers puts lot of time into it. If something doesnt even go through a Phase 1 trial in humans its due to the fact that it is innefective or not statiscally signigficant of a result to even test on humans. The Reseachers knew GHK-CU was a waste of time mechanistically and theoretically. The people who fund the study also thought the same. It does do things to a certain extent but nothing significant to make a difference. things like Tret, Taz, and so on exits n its not filling any gaps that make a difference.
Link Reply
#19
TDLR; GHK isnt going to give you glass glowing skin, it doesnt do anything better than what we currently have in the pharmalogical industry, nor will it be the difference on whether you have good skin or not
Link Reply

Go to the end of the thread to reply →

More in Site Feedback