Skip to content
For research use only. Not for human or animal consumption. Read the content policy

COAs & Lab Testing

I’m really unsure about BBA’s HGH

Started by Bob Dylan 17 replies 8 people Last activity

OP
#1
I’m really unsure about BBA’s HGH. I’ve seen about 4 different test results. 3 were really poor and now we have this awesome result. All different caps, different batches, different size vials and now they’re saying they have sold out of H36 to a large buyer (this will be their excuse to stop selling the bad stuff). Who knows where it is at. They need to pick a colour cap, produce a new batch and send the new batch for testing. Ideally it should have minimal dimmer, purity in excess of 95% and be overfilled, not under filled. They need to sort out this mess because it’s tainting their whole line of products. Apart from that I can’t fault BBA. Their comms are excellent. Just sort the HGH scenario please
Link Reply
#2
They also need to address the poor results. They’ve been quiet about them. Post them to the COA section. Explain the scenario and explain the path forward. Explain there is a new batch. Sell all old stock at steep discount. Get new batch Jano’s and let’s move on.
Link Reply
#3
100%. But evidently they have chosen otherwise against our advise and apparently the advise of Mia. Theres only so much we can do. Keep pushing and calling them out for not being transparent and show our dissatisfaction with our money being spend elsewhere
Link Reply
#17
Cap colour unless they add batch numbers to the kits is the only way we can track against COA's. Logic tells use that a run of say RT15 will all be done with the same cap colour. If the factory would only change cap colour for a peptide when using new raws, then this way if a COA is done, we can get generally assured of the purity/quantity of the peptide. That said, for all the COA's produced so far besides HGH I have not seen anything of an issue, even if the purity is 98% and quantity is 5% less, it's still way way cheaper than big pharma, and I would not complian, as long as I know it I can adjust accordingly.
Link Reply
Support
#18
there was one issue with dsip being 33% underdosed but it was fixed oh no 2 slu was 50% there abouts also been fixed, and I havce addressed them to fix their weighing and manafacturing and they're improving and applying upgrades
Link Reply

That was the end of the thread

You just read 18 posts from 8 people in COAs & Lab Testing, written between Dec 2025 and Jan 2026.

Reading stays open to everyone — nothing here is behind a login. An account adds one thing: the ability to answer.